Raw

Crit on the xml.com articles for dajobe :



Why Choose RSS 1.0? (XML.com) asks Tony Hammond, Elsevier.

His answer might be that:

• it was designed to be extensible.
• it has been stable for 3 years.
• is maintained openly by a community.

Although all of those apply, he chose it for reason #1.

Extending RSS (XML.com) by Danny Ayers. RSS 1.0 is all about extensions and was designed so. Take this article and ignore the bits about the loosly defined and ever-changing RSS fork and stick with the RSS 1.0 information.

I'm saying nowt ;-)

Dave Beckett - Journalblog: July 2003 Archives

[Danny Ayers]