Oh well, I'm getting repetitive, but still, as everyone's still
OPML-bashing. :-)
Getting data out of OPML and RSS 2.0 is SynWeb rather than
SemWeb, because the decision as to what the information "means" is
decided by the scrapers (following usage conventions) rather than
by explicit URIs added by the data's creators.
Tools trump formats and processes. The funny thing is not
simply that this is *true*, but that the entire history of computer
science can be interpretted as one long war between pragmatic tool
builders and idealistic format / process builders. And the tools
win every time. And the idealists *still* haven't noticed.
A format without a tool is like a technology without a
business model. It has no interface to the wider, user, consumer
community. It is not ecologically "fit". It can't feed itself on
user attention or money but must be kept on life-support by
optimists.
The SemWeb people are great programmers. They spend all their
time writing code. How come they never actually produce any
"tools"? Because all the tools they produce are explained like this
: "this is a great tool because it uses a better format / process".
That's not a "tool" or an "application". Because tools /
applications have an inner-world of their technology, and an
outer-world of their usage. And they have a story that mediates
between the two. That explains *why* this technology is necessary
for that usage.
SebWeb programs have an inner-technology *and* an outer
usage. But they have no story that joins the two together. A story
that says "this technology is *also* for that usage, but better (by
some internal criteria)" isn't the same thing. This is why they
must be parasitic on the story provided by real tools like the OPML
Editor and various RSS generators, consumers.
[ Danny response, short version: "The entire history of computer science can be interpretted as one long war between pragmatic tool builders and idealistic format / process builders." You could interpret it that way, but it's a false dichotomy, there is no war. What good are the OPML Editor and RSS aggregators without those formats? They both also have extremely idealistic processes (broken ones, but nonetheless idealistic). Good tools are easier with good formats (and vice versa). ]
@en