Raw

Hi Danny,

No, I didn't say that we had 60 submissions (or I hope I didn't say that). We must have crossed lines there. We had 23 submissions, each one was given three reviewers, hence more than 60 reviews to co-ordinate. This year we ran the reviewing process entirely manually. Next time, we'll use one of the conference submissions management tools that are around.



Actually I was really pleased at the number, range and quality of submissions we had for a brand new workshop. As you say, it looks like a great programme.



Hope that clarifies everything!



Regards,

Ian

@en